Friday, May 25, 2018

Multicultural Swedish town becomes hell on earth: A girl and two women tell their stories

Staffanstorp is a small town in Skåne, Sweden. After several violent incidents the town’s inhabitants, especially women, feel insecure, news outlet Fria Tider reports.
The stories of the people of Staffanstorp went public after investigative journalist Joakim Lamotte visited the town. Previously the town was only known for a horrible knife incident, for which an Afghan migrant was arrested.
In front of Lamotte’s camera, Swedes describe the town as dangerous and full of violence, with gangs dominating its public space.
Read further or check the translated video at the bottom of the page.
One girl tells how she was sexually harassed and punched at her former school every day. “They locked me up in the toilet and hit me with bands. They punched and joked on me. It happened every day,” she says.
“Suddenly they came forward and grab my breasts. After I punched the guy, the whole family came and told me I’m a little horny and that I need to shut up. When I’m out with my dogs, they throw stones on the dogs,” she continues, pointing out that she is afraid of what will happen to her siblings and cousins in the future.
A woman explains that the affected children urge their parents not to do anything, because the gang will take revenge on the children. Another woman tells how she was “brutally” beaten by a gang of 15 people.
But during the live broadcast, a politically correct lawyer suddenly comes across and denies the whole horror image of Staffanstorp. He says the town is ‘peaceful’ during spring.
According to the lawyer, it is completely wrong to contribute to ‘hate’ in society. He claims that Lamotte’s website is “terrible” to read. But one of the girls replies: “People need to know what is happening!”

Soros-funded ‘Human Rights’ NGO Lobbies Merkel to Punish Patriotic Hungary

Human Rights Watch, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) bankrolled by billionaire open borders campaigner George Soros, is lobbying Germany’s Angela Merkel to crack down on the Hungarian government.

Soros’s flagship Open Society Foundations network recently announced it would be leaving Budapest, where the financier spent his youth, for Angela Merkel’s Berlin, following the crushing, super-majority landslide won by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party in the recent national elections.Now Human Rights Watch, which reported a massive $100 million donation from Soros via Open Society Foundations in 2010, is lobbying Angela Merkel’s party to expel Fideszfrom the European People’s Party, the quasi-conservative political group it sits with in the European Parliament.“Hungary’s governing party, Fidesz uses xenophobia to fuel discrimination against migrants and is now trying to silence NGOs,” the group claims — referring to the ‘Stop Soros’ package of proposed reforms which would levy taxes on the largely Soros-funded ‘civil society’ groups enabling and endorsing illegal migration, and use the money to strengthen border and immigration controls.
Human Rights Watch demands to know if Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) is happy to see the Hungarians’ pro-sovereignty, anti-mass migration values “infecting” the European Union, and insists “the leaders of CDU and [Christian Social Union] parties — Angela Merkel and Horst Seehofer — should not sit silent on the sidelines but stand up for Europe”.Chancellor Merkel may be amenable to putting pressure on Orbán, whose leadership of an increasingly vocal bloc of Central European countries opposed to mass migration and the transfer of sovereignty from national capitals to the European Union is proving increasingly troublesome.
Human Rights Watch may have more trouble convincing Seehofer’s Christian Social Union, the slightly more conservative Bavarian sister party to Merkel’s Christian Democrats.
Seehofer has invited Orbán to address the CSU several times, and shares many of his concerns about mass migration — even saying that he wanted Bavaria to participate in the “central European alliance” of nations opposed to the large-scale movement of people into Europe from Africa and the Middle East in 2017.

Under new law, most Swedish men could be sentenced to jail for rape

By Ed Straker

Sweden, suffering an epidemic of rapes and assaults caused by Muslims, has decided instead to focus on the politically correct needs of its feminist population, passing a new law that will effectively enable nearly all men to be tried for rape.
Under the new law, unless a woman explicitly consents to sex, the man can be tried for rape.
On Wednesday, the Swedish Parliament passed the law requiring explicit consent – verbal or physical – from participants before they engage in a sexual act.
How is consent explicit if it can be physical?
Does consent come in stages for each part of the sex act, and can the woman claim she changed her mind midway through stage 4, so to speak?
Beginning on July 1, when the new law comes into effect, a prosecutor will need simply show that explicit consent was never given.
Since consent is verbal or physical, how does a prosecutor show the absence of consent?  It's like trying to prove that something didn't happen.  Either this law is completely meaningless or it will enable prosecutors to cast a wide net to arrest men without evidence.
While some argue that the law will be problematic to enforce, others say the legislation is more about changing the culture.
That's exactly what this law is about.  There's a mindset that men are rapists and women are victims, even if they don't even know that they are victims.
"The expectation that there should be bruises and clear evidence of physical resistance is also something this legislation moves away from[.] ... So we think it's natural that only active participation should be interpreted as a yes.  Passivity cannot be read as consent."
Of course it can be read that way.  That's the way most sex occurs.  There are no men who constantly ask their wives or girlfriends for permission.  They know that if their wives or girlfriends don't want to do something, they will say something.
But the Swedish legislators believe that women are developmentally disabled invalids, incapable of saying no.  If you take that a step farther, if women are incapable of saying no, then how can they be capable of saying "yes"?  
Since one can never prove that a girlfriend or wife gave consent, conceivably, every Swedish man could be charged with rape by a vengeful wife or girlfriend.
Now we all have a new reason not to go to Sweden.  It's just a race to the bottom to see if Sweden will become a caliphate or a matriarchy.

Manhunt Underway After Mississauga, Canada Restaurant Bombed

Peel Regional Police

Police have released security camera stills after a late-night bombing at a restaurant in Mississauga, Canada Thursday triggered a manhunt.

The improvised explosive device was detonated inside Indian restaurant Bombay Bhel in Mississauga, a city neighbouring Toronto in Ontario at around 2230 Thursday night, injuring 15 people. Of those, three were taken to the trauma centre in Toronto with critical injuries, all of whom were said to be in a stable condition by the early hours of Friday morning.

Eyewitnesses to the aftermath of the blast said there was a lot of blood and broken glass on the floor of the restaurant. There were no fatalities, reports the Toronto Star.Two suspects fled the scene and are sought by police. The who males, who were heavily covered in clothing to frustrate identification have been described by police in broad terms. The first suspected bomber is said to appear to be in his mid-20s, standing around six feet tall and having a stocky build.
No estimated age was given for the second man, who was described as standing around 5’10” and having a slim build.
Police have not yet revealed whether there is a known motive for the attack. The Consulate General of India has opened a helpline in the aftermath of the blast, a move which suggests many of the victims may be Indian citizens.

Holland: Antisemitic cabaret program on Dutch socialist television channel

Via Bad News from the Netherlands blog:
A cabaret program on the Dutch Socialist VARA television by Sanne Wallis de Vries has used Israel's Eurovision winning song as a parody.  
Her text contains antisemitic motifs such as jokes about Jews and money.  
It also accuses Israel of using Buk rockets which Israel does not have. These rockets were used to bring down a plane of mainly Dutch passengers in the Ukraine. They all died.
read more in Dutch here

If Israel were to fall, the West would cease to exist: “Allah Akbar” is the Islamist battle cry in Rafah, just as it is in Paris

by Giulio Meotti

Israel is a very tiny state. From north to south, from Metulla to Eilat, a modern jet covers the entire Israeli territory in than 10 minutes. Between Natanya, the city overlooking the Mediterranean, and the Palestinian Arab town of Tulkarem, there are 15 miles.
Israel has the double of population of my Italian city, Rome. If you climb to Gush Etzion, a few miles south of Jerusalem, you can see the entire Jewish State from Jordan to the sea. In one of the narrower points in central Israel, the full width of the state from the Mediterranean to the Green Line is just 9 miles. Three times the length of the airport runway at the John F. Kennedy in New York.
The Arab-Islamic world occupies 800 times the land that today is Israel. So why should non-Jews care about this tiny Jewish enclave? Because those who want to destroy Western civilization are also those trying to erase Israel from the map, as occurred last week at the border with Gaza.
“Allah Akbar” is the Islamist battle cry in Rafah as in Paris.
In one week, the United States first vetoed a UN resolution that wanted to condemn Israel for the dead in Gaza, then voted against an investigation by the Geneva Human Rights Council. Had it not been for the US, Israel would have been crucified by the international community.
The European countries, in fact, betrayed the Jews once again (Belgium and Spain voted against Israel, UK and Germany abstained). It is not just a security issue, as it is for Egypt or Jordan. Of course, Israel has for example, prevented three Middle Eastern countries from building a clandestine nuclear arsenal: Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Bashar al Assad's Syria and Iran's Ayatollah. But this American protection of Israel arises from a commonality of values, ideals, principles.Why, in fact, does the cause of Israel generate so much passion even in non-Jews all over the world? Why Israel?
What makes this stubborn bug wedged in the Middle East so special? Israel is in the Middle East, but it incorporates the very rare sap of the “West” as values, tradition and hopes. In the critical phase for survival of Israel, the nihilist Jihad offensive makes no difference between the roads of Nice and Nahal Oz.If Israel were to fall, the West that we know, that our fathers helped to defend and build, would cease to exist.Non-Jews from all parts of the globe should see Israel as the symbol of a great story that speaks of love, freedom, justice and rebellion against evil. Israel is the symbol of the possibility of being free outside the borders of the West. And this is precisely why Israel today is an intolerable presence for the fanatics and the relativists.

For decades, Israel has been the first target of Islamic fundamentalism that has the civilization of the West in its demoniac viewfinder, and does not even hide it. The clash is not about the Israeli Gibraltar, it is about the danger of an end of civilization itself.

Charles Peguy said: “Civilization dies”. And it dies a little bit every day in the Western betrayal of Israel.


The left proved once again how it had sold out to the Jihad Lobby when in turned on Aung San Suu Kyi to support Rohingya Muslim migrants terrorizing the indigenous population in Myanmar. 
It's hard to look at any media foreign affairs section without seeing three Jihad Lobby lies
1. Yemen is experiencing a famine caused by Saudi bombing (of Iran-backed Shiite Jihadists)
2. Gaza is an open-air prison (administered by Hamas)
3. Rohingya Muslims are experiencing the next genocide (as perpetrators, if they had their way)
A Rohingya armed group brandishing guns and swords is responsible for at least one, and potentially a second, massacre of up to 99 Hindu women, men, and children as well as additional unlawful killings and abductions of Hindu villagers in August 2017, Amnesty International revealed today after carrying out a detailed investigation inside Myanmar’s Rakhine State.

Based on dozens of interviews conducted there and across the border in Bangladesh, as well as photographic evidence analyzed by forensic pathologists, the organization revealed how Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) fighters sowed fear among Hindus and other ethnic communities with these brutal attacks. 
The killings involved all the usual staples of Islamic supremacist genocide since the days of Mohammed.
Armed men dressed in black and local Rohingya villagers in plain clothes rounded up dozens of Hindu women, men and children. They robbed, bound, and blindfolded them before marching them to the outskirts of the village, where they separated the men from the women and young children. A few hours later, the ARSA fighters killed 53 of the Hindus, execution-style, starting with the men. 

Eight Hindu women and eight of their children were abducted and spared, after ARSA fighters forced the women to agree to “convert” to Islam.
Here's a key point.
At around 8am on 25 August 2017, ARSA attacked the Hindu community in the village of Ah Nauk Kha Maung Seik, in a cluster of villages known as Kha Maung Seik in northern Maungdaw Township. At the time of the attack, the Hindu villagers lived in close proximity to Rohingya villagers, who are predominantly Muslim. Rakhine villagers, who are predominantly Buddhist, also lived in the same area...
"[The men] held knives and long iron rods. They tied our hands behind our backs and blindfolded us. I asked what they were doing. One of them replied, ‘You and Rakhine are the same, you have a different religion, you can’t live here. He spoke the [Rohingya] language." 
The Rohingya Muslim migrants are at war with the Buddhists. So why kill and enslave Hindu villagers? Because they practice a different religion.
It's right there in his own words.
The Rohingya aren't defending themselves. No more than the Egyptian-Jordanian migrant terrorists known as the "Palestinians" are. They're supremacists who invade other countries in the name of Islam. And kill and enslave the indigenous populations because they practice a different religion.
And, since the days of Mohammed, if you practiced a different religion, you couldn't live near Islamic Sharia supremacist populations without submitting to Islam.
I recall seeing a photo  of Buddhist monks at a protest holding up a banner reading, "The world is not for Muslims alone" contrasted with an Islamic rally featuring signs, "Islam will rule the world".

Thursday, May 24, 2018

On our own behalf: The new Data Protection Directive will enter into force in Europe tomorrow

The new Data Protection Directive will enter into force in Europe tomorrow. The German Merkel government has even tightened this directive. Many bloggers and website operators have already given up. That was  the real intention of the German government: to silence independent voices. Also exists now danger for life and limb of the remaining Internet publicists, since in the imprint the private address of the web page operator must be published. In a country like Germany, where Islam terrorists and Antifa have already committed acts of violence against authors critical of Islam, for example, this is an additional threat to freedom of speech. I will continue, but plan to seek asylum in the USA for my 3 weblogs. I'm trying to figure out how that can happen right now. I would be very grateful for any suggestions in this regard. The new censorship law is also the reason why I temporarily deactivated the social media plugins. I will continue to keep you informed on this blog about the latest developments in connection with this law.

Grooming Gangs: Telford MP Says Police Ignored Child Sex Abuse Complaints by Parents

Telford MP Lucy Allan has taken police to task for ignoring large-scale child sexual exploitation by mostly Muslim grooming gangs, with abusers only having to say they did not know the victim’s age to escape justice.

Despite the age of consent across the United Kingdom being 16, men abusing significantly younger children were able to get the police off their backs simply by claiming the victims consented and that they did not know they were underage.
“All the perpetrators have to do is say, ‘The victim willingly met for sex and did not tell me her age’,” complained Allan, who has campaigned determinedly for a proper inquiry into the widely unreported abuse of around a thousand girls in her constituency, as well as tightening of the consent laws.

“As each case comes to light, we cannot just go on wringing our hands and saying how horrific it is that different cases are emerging up and down the country,” she added, emphasising the need for concrete action.Allan described how police treated one 13-year-old as a willing participant in her abuse by a group of older men, even after she became pregnant and her parents reported what was happening.
“The grooming began while she was celebrating her 13th birthday in a local restaurant. While she was still 13, she became pregnant by one of those men, and her parents realised what was going on and went to the police.
“The identity of the perpetrators was not an issue and arrests were quickly made.
“Two things went wrong, however: the police failed to identify that the men were connected to each other, or that the child had been groomed. The police treated the men as if each one was in a separate relationship with the child.
“She was treated as willingly engaging in sexual activity with men she had voluntarily chosen to have a relationship with.
“How can the authorities assume that a child as young as 13 would willingly consent to sex with multiple men?” Allan demanded.“Let us be honest: in the cases I am talking about, the men are not in the child’s social network — they are not young teenagers from the child’s school, or known to the child’s parents or older siblings,” the MP said.
“They are groups of adult men targeting young girls through street grooming or in takeaways and restaurants.
“How can the police possibly assume with good reason that the targeted child consents simply because she did not refuse sexual intercourse?
“Consent must be freely given without duress or coercion. Consent is a voluntary act.”

Antifa Advertise Conference Featuring Group Who Had Members Convicted of 1993 Bombing



The UK branch of the far-left extremist group Antifa recently held a conference in which members of Red Action, a group known for their connection to the 1993 Harrods bombing, speaking alongside Danish Antifa extremists.

The meeting, which was held earlier this week in London on May 21st, was entitled “Building Antifascism in Our Communities” as part of the “Projekt Antifa” speaking tour and was hosted by the far-left Solstar Sports Association.
The speakers for the event were, according to the organisers, “several generations of Antifascists including members from Projekt Antifa in Copenhagen, Gary O’Shea of Red Action and comrades from Left Hook and AFA”.

Several of the groups have links to both violence and extremism. One of the groups, Red Action, was linked to the 1993 Harrods bombing in which two members, Patrick Hayes, a leading member of the group at the time, and Jan Taylor, were convicted of planting a bomb for the IRA and sentenced to 30 years in prison each.When police attempted to arrest the pair two months after the bombing, they were met with gunfire, though no police were injured in the arrest. After taking the two Red Action members into custody, police found 22lbs of Semtex, a large stockpile of homemade explosives, several handguns, ammunition, and remote detonators for potential bombs.
The meeting and public association with Red Action come after Antifa in Germany released a “riot tourist” handbook which called on other far-left extremists to attack targets at the upcoming conference of the anti-mass migration populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) to be held in Augsburg next month.
The handbook also listed a blog site which then linked to another booklet entitled “Prisma” which lists instructions on how to build firebombs, including those with remote detonators, how to evade police forensics, and even instruction on how to sabotage power lines.
The event was shared on Twitter by the account “Antifascist Network” which has previously been tweeted at by the head researcher of the “anti-hate” organisation HOPE not Hate (HnH) Dr Joe Mulhall.
Mulhall asked the account, along with several other Antifa accounts, their “thoughts” on a mini-documentary he had worked on for HnH in which he visited the Kurdish region of Northern Iraq in 2014.
HOPE not Hate, which has previously received funding from left-wing billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, has been accused of using tactics described as “dirty, underhand[ed], low down, unscrupulous,” by the organisation’s former spin doctor Dan Hodges.

Tuttlingen / Germany: Rejected asylum seeker beats up a politician

A rejected asylum seeker has beaten a Merkel party politician in the town of Tuttlingen in Baden-Wuerttemberg with a roof slat with nails and screws and injured him. Previously, 48-year-old Pakistani smashed a window in the district administration office, smashed a computer and smashed a female driver's car, the Bild newspaper reports. CDU politician and head of social affairs Bernd Mager could see from his office window how 48-year-old Said K. beat up the driver's car. But Mager's attempts to calm him down failed, Said K. injured him with the roof batten on his face. Nevertheless, the 55-year-old politician was able to overwhelm the man. The 48-year-old Pakistani has been living in a refugee home in the village since October 2015, and in February 2016 authorities rejected his application for asylum. According to Mager, he had repeatedly been convicted of crimes and had been in psychiatry several times. "He can't be deported because he doesn't have a passport. The Pakistani embassy says that he won't receive papers for at least a year," Mager told the newspaper Bild.

The Merkel effect? Ghettoisation increased significantly in 80% of investigated German cities

A new study of the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin for Social Research (WZB), shows that ghettoisation is increasing in Germany, newspaper Die Welt reports. The social researchers studied 74 cities in the period from 2005 to 2014 in what they call the most comprehensive study to date.
Poor people increasingly live concentrated in certain neighbourhoods. Even young and old people are less and less neighbours, the WZB study shows.
The trend is particularly evident in Eastern Germany, where a lot of cities have areas with large concentrations of prefabricated buildings. The researchers used official information on the concentration of people who live on benefits, the so called Hartz IV recipients.
In 80 per cent of cities, the spatial concentration of people who are Hartz IV recipients has increased significantly. It was strongest where many families with small children and already many needy people live.
“So far, we only know this level from American cities,” says study leader Marcel Helbig. It was “historically unprecedented” how the socio-spatial division in East German cities had increased within a few years.
As a long-term way out for local communities, the authors of the study recommend providing new housing in better locations with strict conditions for a share of social housing.
Angela Merkel, who now serves her fourth term, became Germany’s chancellor in 2005. While she’s spending billions on refugees, she clearly didn’t invest enough in creating good housing conditions for the Germans.

Brexit Betrayal: Sources Confirm Appeaser Theresa Wants SECOND Transition to Stay in EU Customs Union

Sources appear to have confirmed that Theresa May is attempting to tack a second so-called Brexit ‘transition’ on to the one she is currently negotiating with the EU, which would keep Britain inside the bloc’s Customs Union until at least 2023.

The Prime Minister has already signed up to a ‘transition’ after Britain’s formal exit from the EU in 2019, which will last to the end of 2020 and see the country continue to abide by all the bloc’s rules and regulations, and even extend its Free Movement immigration regime to include impoverished Croatia.The Times now reports that she is proposing that this ‘transition’ should be followed immediately by another one, which would keep Britain inside the EU Customs Union and leave Brussels in charge of international trade all the way to 2023 — around eight years after voters told politicians they wanted out of the bloc in June 2016.
UKIP leader Gerard Batten told Breitbart London that the move “continues the Prime Minister’s strategy from the outset: delay, impede, overturn. The people will not be listened to, or forgiven.”
He said it was clear that “May’s intention at the next election is to offer the country the stark contrast of ‘Brexit In Name Only’ or Corbyn’s neo-Venezuelan approach.”
“Brexit — real Brexit — will no longer be on the table,” he added, saying that the situation underlined “why UKIP continues to be of vital importance to the country’s politics.”
Leading Tory Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg slammed suggestions Britain could be kept inside the Customs Union beyond the initial ‘transition’ period — which he was not keen on, to begin with — before the proposals apparent confirmation by The Times.
“We have gone from a clear endpoint, to an extension, to a proposed further extension with no endpoint. The horizon seems to be unreachable. The bottom of the rainbow seems to be unattainable,” he complained.
“People voted to leave, they did not vote for a perpetual purgatory.”
The Remainer-dominated House of Commons Select Committee appears to sense an opportunity, however, with chairman Hilary Benn, of the Labour Party, pushing for Britain to stay in the Customs Union indefinitely.