Sunday, March 31, 2019

Again terror by Turks on German highways: Is the Bolide now replacing the knife as a weapon ?

Once again in recent weeks, the behaviour of a Turkish wedding party on roads or motorways has led to a police operation. After the police in Hamburg had to stop a wedding car convoy after shots, a Turkish wedding party on the highway A8 near Esslingen over three lanes blocked the traffic, another Turkish wedding party with shots on the highway A3 in Lower Franconia celebrated and another wedding party the highway A3 near Düsseldorf with expensive sports cars for a photo shooting had blocked, the latest incident occurred near Stuttgart.On Saturday afternoon on the highway A81 Heilbronn-Stuttgart, members of a wedding party blocked the traffic with at least four expensive cars and recorded the resulting traffic jam. The police reported that they had blocked all lanes towards the Engelberg tunnel for no reason and thus brought traffic to a complete standstill.Wedding guests leaned out of the car windows to record the traffic jams. At the Sindelfinger Forest roadhouse, the police stopped those involved and patrolled them. The investigators are now looking for witnesses to the incident.

London ex-mayor: 'It's not anti-Semitic to hate the Jews of Israel'

Ken Livingstone, the former mayor of London, already notorious for his past anti-Zionist statements, said at a meeting last week, "It’s not antisemitic to hate the Jews of Israel." "You can’t have a proper functioning democracy in a world in which the media, whether it’s the press or internet, can just spread lie after lie after lie," he added. Livingstone's comments were first reported in the United Kingdom's Daily Mail newspaper. Livingstone, who quit Labour last year following a two year suspension for his comment that Hitler supported Zionism was speaking at a meeting of "Labour Against The Witchhunt." The "Labour Against The Witchhunt" group says that criticism of anti-Semitism within Labour is a "witchhunt" designed to push Corbyn out of power. Livingstone also blamed accusations of anti-Semitism in Labour on 'ghastly old Blairites... doing everything possible to get rid' of Corbyn." "Blairites" is a reference to former allies of former prime minister Tony Blair - Labour members who were not part of the party's hard left and would have spoken about against anti-Semitism in the party. Livingstone served as London's mayor from 2002 until 2008 and prior to that was a Member of Parliament (MP) for Brent East from 1987 to 2001.

Germany: African man harasses a woman and hits a man coming to her aid in the face with a broken neck of a bottle

A dispute between two men aged 22 and 60 yesterday early Saturday morning caused severe facial injuries to the elderly. On his way to work at 5:40 a.m., the 60-year-old had approached the 22-year-old in the Klett Passage in Stuttgart, who apparently was harassing a previously unknown woman. Subsequently, the African smashed a bottle and stabbed the victim in the face with the broken neck of the bottle. He then attacked an uninvolved passer-by at the age of 52 for no reason, who was finally able to overwhelm the attacker and detain him until the police arrived. The 60-year-old had to be admitted to hospital because of his severe facial injury. At the request of the Stuttgart public prosecutor's office, the 22-year-old Somalian was brought before a magistrate who issued an arrest warrant. Witnesses to the incidents, in particular the unknown woman, are asked to call the police telephone number +4971189905778.

An Apology for Mexico?

Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (referred to as AMLO) has asked Spain to apologize for past colonial crimes. Spain has refused to do so. Many view this as a supreme virtue signaling, in which Spain refused to indulge.
Historically, the Spanish undeniably committed many crimes in Mexico, but given that the Aztecs were practicing human sacrifice – which influenced many aboriginal tribes to ally with Spain’s Hernán Cortés in his war against the Aztecs – it is a surely nuanced case. Would Presidente AMLO have preferred that the Aztecs have won?
Of course, though not stated, Presidente AMLO’s demand for apology is part of the present worldwide zeitgeist which can be roughly summarized as: People of Color: Good – Euro-White: Bad.
This is nothing new. Susan Sontag said as much in the 1960s:

The white race is the cancer of human history.

Sontag never fully appreciated the benefits of being white, herself. Of course, neither does AMLO. Anyone who has seen his photograph must know that there is a lot of Euro-Spanish in him. Though he claims some indigenous ancestry on his father’s side, his maternal ancestors came from Northern Spain (Cantabria and Asturias), ironically, the “whitest” region of white Spain. Spain’s northern coast has a lot of Celtic and Visigothic DNA, which was not mixed with the Moors.
So AMLO is a bit late to the game, and a bit confused.
The Vatican has apologized for its past crimes in the New World.

Pope Francis offered a direct apology on Thursday for the complicity of the Roman Catholic Church in the oppression of Latin America during the colonial era… New York Times -- 2015

However, what is left out is that in many instances the Roman Catholic Church, though flawed, sought to curtail the excesses of the conquistadors. Sadly, the Protestant conquerors were not much better.
Still, I think most modern Catholics would be happier if the pope concentrated on the Catholic Church’s more recent crimes, such as the sexual predation scandals. Perhaps doing away with clerical celibacy would be a start – and leave the 16th century crimes of colonialism to the judgment of God.
I take a more pragmatic view of a lot of this.
What is the population of the natives before and after the European conquests?
For example: the population of Africa was 90 million in 1800. Today, it is 1.2 billion. Does anyone doubt that the introduction of Western (read White European) medicine, hygiene, and electricity is responsible for most of this?
This is not to lessen the horrors, for example, of the crimes committed in the Belgian Congo at the end of the 19th century, but it is to put them in perspective. For every native killed by the white man, how many Africans have been saved by medicines invented by the white man? The balance of good is weighted in favor of whites.
In almost every colonial case – there are some exceptions – the native peoples were often in better shape after the white man left than before the white man came. Yes, crimes were committed, but the overall trend of history has been general improvement under white Christian rule.
But what about those exceptions? Here is a short (and incomplete) list:

Spain itself -- I seriously think Spain would have been better had it not been occupied by the Muslims. I am contrarian to the present opinion regarding the glories of Muslim Spain. Indeed, a closer examination shows that whatever Spain got from the Muslims was something the Muslims stole from somewhere else, often from whites. The benefits would have come to Spain in any event, without the culture distorting horrors introduced by the Muslims.

North Africa – At one point, North Africa was totally Christian and prosperous. The Muslims took over and North Africa became a dump. Perhaps an apology is due, but, outside of the Copts, there are no indigenous Christians left to claim it.

Anatolia – Present-day Turkey was once home to the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, which in the 6th century made it all the way out to Southern Spain. It lasted until the 15th century. Erdogan is presently crushing the few remaining Christians who are left. He wants to make the originally Christian Hagia Sofia a mosque… again.

Ireland and Highland Scotland -- There can be no doubt that English wars brutalized the Irish, and England’s policies aggravated the potato famine. That, along with the Highland Clearances, precipitated a mass exodus of Gaels to the outside world. There are far fewer Gaels in Ireland and the Scottish Highlands than there were in the early 19th century. However, that is mitigated by the fact that there are many times more Gaels in the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Argentina than there ever were in the Gaelic homelands. Unlike Aztec Mexico, one could make the case that Scotland and Ireland would have prospered, and possibly been better, without colonial intrusion. But, this was an intra-white contest, and so does not count with today’s virtue signalers.

The Old (Baltic) Prussians – They have disappeared to history. They were wiped out (or absorbed) between the Balts and the Germans. But they were only white, and could not possibly be real victims.

The Indians – At least 80 million Indians were slaughtered due to the Muslim invasions, but no one dares asks the Muslims for an apology, or recompense from the Saudis, the present owners of Mecca. King Abdullah of Jordan, a direct descendant of Mohammed, and his country, are too bankrupt to pay reparations.

Tibet – Tibet is iffy. While the Communist Chinese are cruel, the Tibetan culture was truly deranged with a demigod Dalai Llama. Children were put into enforced celibate monasticism before hitting puberty. The whole cult was bizarre. But whoever was right or wrong, they are not officially Euro-white, and so cannot be held up to condemnation. Just consider Tibet’s indigenous idiocy to be a proud heritage of color, even if Tibetans have a substantial amount of Indo-European DNA -- at least the Nazis thought so.

The Christian Lebanese – More than once, the Muslims tried to wipe out the Christians in Lebanon. Today there are more than 10 times as many Lebanese Christians in the New World than are left in Lebanon, which is evidence of the severity of the ethnic cleansing done by the Muslims. Were the Christian Lebanese to return, they would outnumber the Muslims many times over.

Much of what we consider the white race once occupied large areas out to the borders of China. The Uighurs, whom China considers a problem today, are genetically 60% Indo-European. But not only the Chinese caused problems for the Uighurs; they were also hammered by Islam, until they became Muslim.

Asian and African aggressions (the Huns, Islamic, and Mongols) permanently wrested large areas from white control and even advanced into Western Europe for a while. Muslims even made it up to Poland.

The Indigenous of the Americas -- Here, one has something of a case. But often the excesses or crimes were committed after the Europeans powers had left. For example: Argentina’s General Julio Roca started his Conquest of the Desert decades after Spain had been booted out. While there were crimes committed, a good portion, if not the majority, of the deaths were due to disease, not genocide.

How far the present idiocy has become the new norm can best be seen by watching this comment from a Jewish returnee, Yehuda HaKohen, to Silwan in Jerusalem. 

I got to New York the same way black people got to New York. White people invaded my country… Vice News – YouTube (10:40)

Though born in New York, Mr. HaKohen compares himself to the black experience. Well, while the Jews were victims of the Romans -- who often used local Mideastern tribes in their legions, according to Josephus -- someone should tell HaKohen that he, himself, is white.
In the diaspora, many Jews mixed, and HaKohen is living proof. He did not get to New York the same way black people got to New York, not unless black people came on steamships from Europe.

The origin of the Ashkenazi Jews, who come most recently from Europe, has largely been shrouded in mystery. But a new study suggests that at least their maternal lineage may derive largely from Europe. -- Live Science

Don’t you just cringe when blue-eyed, fair-skinned people claim to be people of color?
Now, I am not saying that the Spanish were innocents in Mexico or that Europeans were innocents everywhere; but let’s keep a sense of proportion. Overall, European colonialism, for all its faults, did more good than harm. And remember that people of color were sometimes the colonizers, while whites were sometimes the victims.
Ask yourself this question: If Mexico today were populated by Europeans (say the Belgians, or the Germans, or the French), or even by the Japanese, would it be a rich country or a poor one?
Take for example Scotland. The Scots do not seek reparations for the crimes of Edward Longshanks (a matter of the past), but many would like to be free of England (a present issue confronting the Scots today).
I would recommend that AMLO work on present issues and leave the conquistadors to history.

Germany: A Syrian stabbed 16-year-olds in front of a disco - the knifeman was released again

In Bad Kissingen, Lower Franconia (district of Arnshausen), a 20-year-old Syrian stabbed a 16-year-old boy in front of a discotheque after a dispute between two groups.They continued their argument shortly before 2 am in the parking lot in front of the disco. In the following scuffle, a 20-year-old Syrian apparently pulled a forbidden butterfly knife and stabbed the teenager several times. Security detained the 20-year-old until the police arrived. The rescue service brought the 16-year-old to a hospital with severe but not life-threatening cuts.The presumed perpetrator was released after a blood sample had been taken on the order of the public prosecutor's office. The police in Bad Kissingen will conduct further investigations in close cooperation with the public prosecutor's office in Schweinfurt.

UK: Radical Muslims Welcome, Persecuted Christians Need Not Apply

In two unrelated cases, the United Kingdom denied asylum to persecuted Christians by bizarrely citing the Bible and Jesus. Both Christians, a man and a woman, are former Muslims who were separately seeking asylum from the Islamic Republic of Iran, the ninth-worst persecutor of Christians -- particularly of those who were Muslims and converted to Christianity.
UK asylum worker Nathan Stevens recently shared their stories. In his rejection letter from the UK's Home Office, which is in charge of immigration, the Iranian man was told that biblical passages were "inconsistent" with his claim to have converted to Christianity after discovering it was a "peaceful" faith. The letter citedseveral biblical excerpts, including from Exodus, Leviticus, and Matthew, presumably to show that the Bible is violent; it said Revelation was "filled with imagery of revenge, destruction, death and violence." The governmental letter then concluded:
"These examples are inconsistent with your claim that you converted to Christianity after discovering it is a 'peaceful' religion, as opposed to Islam which contains violence, rage and revenge."
In response, Nathan Stevens, the asylum seeker's caseworker, tweeted:
"... I've seen a lot over the years, but even I was genuinely shocked to read this unbelievably offensive diatribe being used to justify a refusal of asylum.
Stevens added:
"Whatever your views on faith, how can a government official arbitrarily pick bits out of a holy book and then use them to trash someone's heartfelt reason for coming to a personal decision to follow another faith?
There seemed no awareness that, despite occasional verses of violence in the Bible, its main message, in both the Old and New Testaments, is to be found in Leviticus 19:18: "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
In rejecting the claim for asylum of this man who converted from Islam to Christianity, and presumably compelling his return to Iran, the British government is effectively sentencing him to death.
In the second case, an Iranian female asylum seeker was informed in her rejection letter:
"You affirmed in your AIR [Asylum Interview Record] that Jesus is your saviour, but then claimed that He would not be able to save you from the Iranian regime. It is therefore considered that you have no conviction in your faith and your belief in Jesus is half-hearted."
Recently interviewed on BBC Radio 4, the woman, who wishes to remain anonymous, said:
"When I was in Iran I converted to Christianity and the situation changed and the government were [sic] looking for me and I had to flee from Iran.... In my country if someone converts to Christianity their punishment is death or execution."
Concerning the asylum process, she said that whenever she responded to her Home Office interviewer, "he was either chuckling or maybe just kind of mocking when he was talking to me.... [H]e asked me why Jesus didn't help you from the Iranian regime or Iranian authorities."
These two recently exposed cases appear to be symptomatic not only of a breathtaking lack of logic that flies in the face of history -- God obviously did not always save those who believed in Him -- but also what increasing appears to be a venomous Home Office bias against Christians. For instance, when Sister Ban Madleen, a Christian nun in Iraq who had fled the Islamic State, applied to the Home Office to visit her sick sister in Britain, she was denied a visa -- twice. Another report cites a number of other Christian orderlies who were denied visas, including another nun with a PhD in Biblical Theology from Oxford; a nun denied for not having a personal bank account, and a Catholic priest denied for not being married.
In another case, the Home Office not only denied entry to three heroic Christian leaders -- archbishops celebrated for their efforts to aid persecuted Christians in Syria and Iraq who had been invited to attend the consecration of the UK's first Syriac Cathedral, an event attended by Prince Charles -- but also mockingly told them there was "no room at the inn."
Even longtime Christian residents are being deported. Earlier this year, Asher Samson, 41, a Christian man who had been residing in the UK for 15 years and undergoing theological studies, was deported back to Pakistan -- where he had earlier been "beaten and threatened by Islamic extremists." (Such treatment is normative for Christians in Pakistan, the world's fifth-worst persecutor of Christians.) Samson's former UK pastor said:
"I've received some messages from him. He's very scared, he's fearful for his life.... He's in hiding in Pakistan and his family are terribly worried for him.... At the moment he has no funds to live on — he can't work .... [T]he UK is sending people back to these countries where their lives are in danger."
By contrast, a report from the Barnabas Fund found that in offering asylum, the UK "appears to discriminate in favour of Muslims" instead of Christians. Statistics confirm this allegation:
"Figures obtained by Barnabas Fund under a Freedom of Information request show that out of 4,850 Syrian refugees accepted for resettlement by the Home Office in 2017, only eleven were Christian, representing just 0.2% of all Syrian refugees accepted by the UK."
Statistics from earlier years have shown the same disparity. Although Christians accounted for approximately 10% of Syria's prewar population, the overwhelming majority of Syrians granted asylum by the Home Office were Sunni Muslims. Such an imbalance appears even more bizarre when one realizes that the Islamic State (ISIS) is itself a Sunni organization that targets non-Sunnis, primarily Yazidis, Christians and Shiite Muslims, all minority groups that the U.S. government acknowledges have been targets of genocide.
As Lord David Alton of Liverpool, a life peer in the House of Lords, wrote to Home Secretary Sajid Javid, who heads the Home Office:
"It is widely accepted that Christians, who constituted around 10 per cent of Syria's pre-war population, were specifically targeted by jihadi rebels and continue to be at risk.... As last year's statistics more than amply demonstrate, this [ratio imbalance between Muslim and Christian refugees taken in] is not a statistical blip. It shows a pattern of discrimination that the Government has a legal duty to take concrete steps to address."
Considering that persecuted Christian minorities -- including priests and nuns -- are denied visas, one might conclude that perhaps the Home Office just has extremely stringent asylum requirements. This notion is quickly dispelled, however, when one sees that the Home Office regularly grants visas and refugee status to extremist Muslims. One has yet to hear about Muslim asylum seekers being denied visas because the Koran is too violent, or because they do "not have enough faith" in Muhammad.
Ahmed Hassan, despite having no papers -- and despite telling the Home Office that "he had been trained as an ISIS soldier" -- was still granted asylum two years before he launched a terrorist attack in a London train station that left 30 injured in September 2017.
The Home Office also allowed a foreign Muslim cleric, Hamza Sodagar, to enter and lecture in London, even though he advocates beheading, burning, or throwing homosexuals from cliffs.
In addition, according to another report, "British teenagers are being forced to marry abroad and are raped and impregnated while the Home Office 'turns a blind eye' by handing visas to their [mostly Muslim] husbands."
The case of Asia Bibi -- a Christian mother of five who has spent the last decade of her life on death row in Pakistan for challenging the authority of Muhammad -- is perhaps emblematic of the immigration situation in the UK. After she was finally acquitted last November, Muslims rioted throughout Pakistan; in one march, more than 11,000 Muslims demanded her instant and public hanging.
As Pakistanis make up the majority of all Muslims in the UK -- Sajid Javid the head of the Home Office is himself Pakistani -- when they got wind that the UK might offer Asia Bibi asylum, they too rioted. As a result, Prime Minister Theresa May personally blocked Bibi's asylum application -- "despite UK playing host to [Muslim] hijackers, extremists and rapists," one headline read. The UK, in other words, was openly allowing "asylum policy to be dictated to by a Pakistan mob," reported the Guardian, "after it was confirmed it urged the Home Office not to grant Asia Bibi political asylum in the UK..."
At the same time, the Home Office allowed a Pakistani cleric, Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri, considered so extreme that he is banned even from his native Pakistan, to come and lecture in UK mosques. Qadri celebrated the slaughter of a politician because he had defended Asia Bibi.
In short, local Muslim opinion apparently plays a major role in the UK's immigration policy: radical Muslims are welcomed with open arms; Christian "infidels" need not apply.
Commenting on the difficulties Christian minority asylum seekers have with the Home Office, Dr. Martin Parsons, the head of research at the Barnabas Fund, remarking that "visas were granted in July to two Pakistani Islamic leaders who have called for the killing of Christians accused of blasphemy," summarized the situation:
"It's unbelievable that these persecuted Christians who come from the cradle of Christianity are being told there is no room at the inn, when the UK is offering a welcome to Islamists who persecute Christians.... There is a serious systemic problem when Islamist leaders who advocate persecution of Christians are given the green light telling them that their applications for UK visas will be looked on favourably, while visas for short pastoral visits to the UK are denied to Christian leaders whose churches are facing genocide. That is an urgent issue that Home Office ministers need to grasp and correct."

Saturday, March 30, 2019

Muslim leader wants Spanish King to apologise for defeating Islam in 1492

A few days ago, the new president of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Abrader, demanded that King Felipe VI ask for forgiveness for the conquest by Spain, and now a mosque in Seville is doing the same but for the Reconquista (the Reconquest, when the Muslim rulers were driven out of Andalusia-Spain).
The Ishbilia mosque has published a post on Facebook under the name of the Islamic Community itself and its president, Yihad Sarasua, in expressing “the sentiments among Spanish Muslims and those who for certain reasons, reside in Spain, for the lack of conciliation between the Crown and the heirs of the Andalusian legacy.”
“Sir, being the King of Spain, I believe that the historical moment has arrived to carry out the recognition of the vileness, plunder, displacement and murders carried out by orders of the Catholic kings and their most direct collaborators, which culminated with the surrender of Granada and the breach of everything subscribed to the Muslim community”, reads the letter.
Besides, he adds that the Muslims were subjected to a “constant persecution” that left “millions of dead”:
“Never has existed such a fierce persecution and eagerness to eliminate a religious community, as was carried out by the old Spanish royalty in the times of Felipe II, an extermination that culminated in the War of the Alpujarres subsequent to the Pragmatic Sanction of 1567.”
This is why King Felipe VI is asked by the mosque to apologise to the Muslim community.
“As a descendant of the aforementioned kings, what a formidable opportunity you would have to demonstrate to the Muslim community your respect and your discrepancy, with the Islamic theses, apologising to our community for so many atrocities and interceding for the recognition of Spanish nationality for the descendants of Al Andalus, as was done with the Sephardic Jewish community.”
So far King Felipe VI has not responded to the Muslim leader’s request.

Please note

Allah's Willing Executioners

From now on also to be accessed via this link:

Germany: An African kills his two children in revenge on his wife

Once again the media are dealing with a father who presumably took revenge on his wife and killed his two children during a weekend visit. This time in Dresden. The case has similarities with the bloody crime of Bielefeld, where only two weeks ago a Turk (now deceased) cut the throats of his children after the divorce from his wife. In the Dresden case, the perpetrator came from Mozambique. The offence occurred in July 2018 in a block of flats district in Dresden-Gorbitz. "According to the prosecution, Eduardo A. (56) had smashed the skulls of his daughters Sylka (3) and Martina (6) and maltreated them with tools," writes the tabloid Bild, giving further details on the case. The prosecution at the Dresden Regional Court charges the accused with having committed the double murder of his children in revenge on the mother (35 y.o.). She had previously left him. However, the father was allowed to visit the children at the weekend."At the end of July 2018, the two girls had spent a day with their father in Dresden-Gorbitz. When the children were not brought back to their mother as agreed, she suspected the worst." The tabloid Bild continues.
The woman, who also comes from Mozambique, then alerted the police. When the officers arrived, they found the father completely drunk. He had 2.51 per mille in his blood and denied that the children were with him. The officers then searched the apartment and found the two children dead shortly afterwards, hidden in the bedroom under a blanket with their skulls smashed in.If convicted, the African is facing life imprisonment. The Turkish perpetrator from Bielefeld is spared this. According to a new report by newspaper Rheinische Post, the father, who seriously injured himself after the crime, died as a result of his suicide attempt.

"Germany has ignored anti-Semitism from the Left."

Orit Arfa met Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Deputy Director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles for an interview. They talked about the current Jewish view of Germany, anti-Semitism on the right, left and Muslim sides, the behavior of Heiko Maas and why Germany should take an anti-Semitism litmus test. Here is a preliminary summary, tomorrow the complete interview.

Why did German security authorities conceal further attacks by the Viennese jihadist Qaeser A.?

"Just yesterday, two other suspected terrorists with whom this Iraqi had formed a joint terrorist group were arrested in Prague, in the Czech Republic," said Interior Minister Herbert Kickl on Thursday in a speech to the Austrian Parliament on the arrest of the Viennese IS sympathizer and assassin Qaeser A..So far German security authorities and the mass media have only reported about the attack on the intercity express line near Allersberg in Bavaria and a bit, but very quietly, about the failed attack at Karlshorst station in Berlin. But today the newspaper Kronen-Zeitung informs us that the suspected IS-terrorist is said to have already committed four attacks on the railway. In addition, the Islamist is said to have already planned his escape to Mecca.Usually a train driver will report steel cables he discovers on the railway tracks. If ominous "disruptions" of this kind occur, the board of Deutsche Bahn will certainly have been informed long ago. It is well known that Ronald Pofalla is a member of this board. A man who may even have saved the mobile phone number of Federal Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel in his mobile phone. Certainly, the federal government, at least the responsible head of department, may have been informed.Politicians must clarify immediately why all security authorities did not inform the population about the attacks. If the other failed or successful attacks are not recognized as such by the police or intelligence services, one wonders whether competent persons in these authorities bear responsibility.Or was the population even deliberately lulled into deceptive security by concealing further attacks?Those responsible at the police, the Federal Criminal Police Office or the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Federal Intelligence Service (which is known to be responsible for terrorists outside Germany) were either incompetent or may have lied to the population by suppressing findings known to the security authorities.The German Parliament (Bundestag) must clarify whether Federal Transport Minister Scheuer and Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer had knowledge. The state parliaments can no longer avoid investigating whether the state ministers responsible for transport and the interior or even the minister presidents of individual states who were affected by attacks on railway facilities were informed at an early stage.If the politicians had no knowledge, however, the question arises as to whether they are still entitled to hold this office. Either way, the political analysis of terrorist acts must have consequences for the German Railways.It would also be the duty of the public service broadcasters to ask these questions.But the state broadcasters ARD and ZDF have so far only reported on the Iraqi attacks in Allersberg and Karlshorst.In view of the high broadcasting fees, viewers can expect from the investigative journalists of ARD and ZDF that they will report broadly and comprehensively on the other two of a total of four known attack targets tonight at prime time.Perhaps one will also learn why not a single state broadcaster journalist was aware of the further attacks that the alleged terrorist Qaeser A. has now confessed to.